BioTech Encyclopedia ⌂ Home

Materials researched for climate

Filter:
prototype Basalt 2024

Four-year basalt field trial in the US Corn Belt

Crushed basalt was spread yearly on a maize–soybean farm for four years; carbon removal was estimated from calcium and magnesium lost from the rock (not measured directly), and crop yields rose about 12–16% with no rise in trace metals in grain.

Built / tested: field-scale trial plots

As reported in: Beerling, Epihov, Kantola et al. (2024). Enhanced weathering in the US Corn Belt delivers carbon removal with agronomic benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.2319436121

Read free · publisher open access

review Hydropower, tidal and wave energy 2016

Greenhouse gases from reservoirs

Deemer and colleagues estimated reservoir water surfaces emit about 0.8 Pg CO2-equivalent per year, mostly as methane, with reservoir productivity the best predictor of emissions.

As reported in: Deemer, Harrison, Li et al. (2016). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Reservoir Water Surfaces: A New Global Synthesis. BioScience. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw117

Read free · publisher open access

lab Nuclear fission and fusion 2013

Deaths and emissions prevented by nuclear power

Kharecha and Hansen calculated that global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air-pollution deaths and 64 Gt CO2-eq of emissions compared with fossil fuels.

As reported in: Kharecha, Hansen (2013). Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power. Environmental Science & Technology. doi:10.1021/es3051197

Read free · publisher open access

lab Natural gas and methane hydrates 2011

Methane footprint of shale gas

Howarth and colleagues estimated 3.6–7.9% of methane from shale-gas wells escapes to the atmosphere over a well's lifetime, giving shale gas a larger 20-year greenhouse footprint than conventional gas, oil or coal. Cathles and colleagues (2012, doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0333-0) argued these fugitive-emission estimates were significantly overestimated.

As reported in: Howarth, Santoro, Ingraffea (2011). Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5

Read free · publisher open access

lab Zeolites 2010

Zeolite 5A vs MOFs for CO2

Compared adsorption of CO2, methane, nitrous oxide and nitrogen on MOF-5, MOF-177 and zeolite 5A.

As reported in: Saha, Bao, Jia et al. (2010). Adsorption of CO2, CH4, N2O, and N2 on MOF-5, MOF-177, and Zeolite 5A. Environmental Science & Technology. doi:10.1021/es9032309

Abstract only